For organisations that need a Data Protection Officer function but cannot justify — or cannot recruit — a full-time hire. A named senior practitioner carries the role, signed onto your engagement letter, ready to be listed in regulatory filings and to take the call when the regulator does.
12 months
Three-tier service intensity
Monthly retainer, fixed
Quarterly review of scope
2 hours for critical
Defined matrix below
The DPOaaS engagement is not advisory adjacent to your DPO function — it is the function. The named practitioner sits in the role, with the responsibilities and the accountability that come with it across KSA PDPL, India DPDP Act, UAE PDPL and any GDPR scope in your operations.
Named contact on filings to SDAIA, UAE Data Office, India DPDP Board and equivalent GCC regulators. Drafts and signs regulator-facing correspondence. Leads inspection response when it happens.
Standing oversight of the operational privacy program — RoPA currency, policy review cycle, control effectiveness, training delivery. The annual privacy audit lands on the DPO's desk.
Authoritative decision-maker on Data Subject Request escalations, breach severity rating, regulator notification thresholds and individual notification scoping. The decision is the DPO's; the playbook is what we built.
Mandatory DPIA review and approval gate for high-risk processing. The DPO does not run the DPIA — your project teams do — but the DPO signs it before the processing starts. Same gate, every time.
Standing advisory line for legal, IT, marketing and product teams. Quarterly all-hands privacy training. Targeted role-specific training for high-risk functions. The DPO is reachable; ambiguity gets answered.
Quarterly written report to the audit, risk or governance committee. Annual board readout with material risks, regulatory horizon and recommended decisions. Plain language, no padding.
The DPOaaS engagement comes in three shapes. The right tier depends on regulatory exposure, jurisdictional spread, organisational size and how much in-house privacy capacity already exists. We will tell you honestly which fits at scoping — and we are happy to step you up or down at the quarterly review if it changes.
Named DPO function for organisations with an in-house privacy lead who need senior cover, escalation support and regulator-facing standing — not day-to-day operational delivery.
The most common arrangement. Active operational involvement — DSR oversight, vendor reviews, training delivery, regulator liaison — with a named senior fractional DPO embedded into your governance cycle.
For multi-jurisdictional groups with complex regulatory exposure. Senior DPO supported by a named privacy analyst and on-call specialist counsel — typically for groups operating across three+ jurisdictions or with active regulator scrutiny.
The retainer is not "call us when something is on fire." There is a documented cadence — monthly, quarterly, annually — that keeps the program healthy and stops privacy from being something only attended to in crisis. Here is what it looks like in practice.
Status of active casework, DSR queue, DPIA pipeline, vendor reviews, regulatory horizon items.
DSR escalations, breach assessments, contract reviews, ad-hoc legal & product advisory.
Standing review window for new high-risk processing requests. Sign-off or rework.
Brief monthly summary to your governance lead, capturing decisions taken and items pending.
Deep review of RoPA currency, control effectiveness, training adoption, vendor risk register.
Written report to audit / risk / governance committee. Material risks, top decisions, no padding.
What's changed in the regulators we cover, what's coming, what it means for your program.
Honest check-in on whether the current tier is still right. Step up, down or stay — your call.
Full internal audit against the regulators in scope. Findings register, severity-rated, owner-assigned.
90-minute board session — current state, top three risks, recommended next-year priorities, decisions sought.
All-hands annual privacy training delivery. Role-specific deep-dives for high-risk functions.
Review of the past 12 months, scope adjustment, next-year retainer agreement. Honest exit option built in.
A retainer without an SLA is a marketing claim. Here is the matrix that goes into the engagement letter — by severity, with named first-response and resolution targets, and the channel that triggers each tier.
| Severity | First response | Resolution target | Channel | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CriticalMaterial harm or regulator window active Critical |
2 hours 24/7 incl. weekends |
Same day 72-hour regulator clock |
Phone + email Direct DPO line |
Confirmed personal-data breach. Active regulator inspection letter. Court / law-enforcement order received. |
| HighTime-bound decision required High |
1 working day Working hours |
3 working days | Email or call Engagement portal |
DPIA sign-off needed for active project. Contract review for vendor onboarding. DSR escalation. |
| StandardRoutine advisory Standard |
1 working day | 5 working days | Email Engagement portal |
Policy interpretation question. New-jurisdiction quick scan. Marketing-campaign privacy review. |
| LowBackground / planning Low |
2 working days | 10 working days | Email or scheduled call | Strategic privacy planning. Training-content review. Long-term roadmap input. |
Severity is set by the DPO, not by the requester. If you log a request as Standard but the practitioner sees a Critical issue, it gets escalated and the Critical SLA applies. The reverse is also true — overflagging gets calmly recalibrated. The point of the matrix is honest response, not gaming the priority scale.
The DPO is named. There is no "team that picks up" model. The same senior practitioner sits in the role for the duration of the retainer, attends every quarterly committee, signs every regulator filing and is the contact when the regulator calls.
Runs the firm's fractional DPO bench. Personally fronts retained DPO mandates for healthcare, edtech and hospitality clients across the GCC. Named in regulatory registrations across SDAIA, the UAE Data Office and the India DPDP Board.
For multi-jurisdiction engagements, additional senior practitioners are named as deputy DPOs for the specific regulators in scope. The lead carries the role; the bench carries the depth.
DPOaaS is the right answer for some organisations and the wrong one for others. The two columns below are the honest test we apply at scoping — and what we will tell you, candidly, on the first call.
Operating across one or more regulated jurisdictions where a named DPO is either required by law or effectively required by stakeholder expectation, with no in-house hire in place.
You have looked. The market for senior DPOs in KSA, the GCC and India is thin and slow. A retained senior is a faster, often better, alternative to an 18-month search.
Large enough to have meaningful regulatory exposure, small enough that a full-time senior DPO at SAR 600k+ annual cost is hard to justify on internal economics.
Operating across two+ of KSA, UAE, the wider GCC and India — where a single in-house DPO would struggle to maintain regulator-facing fluency in all of them.
If you have a senior DPO running a working program, you may need a standing advisory retainer for senior backup — not a replacement DPO function. Different shape, smaller commitment.
Some regulated sectors (notably retail banking, certain telecoms) effectively require a full-time on-site DPO. We can run an embedded interim DPO mandate while you recruit, but DPOaaS will not satisfy the requirement.
If what's actually needed is a finite deliverable — RoPA build, DPIA library, program build — a project engagement is the right shape. Don't pay a 12-month retainer for a 12-week problem.
The DPO function only works if the organisation is willing to be told no occasionally and willing to remediate when it is. We will not be the right firm for organisations that want a DPO badge without DPO governance.
Honest scope boundaries are agreed in the engagement letter. The retainer is not a blank cheque, and it is not a substitute for primary legal counsel, internal compliance teams or specialist platforms. Here is what's outside the line.
The DPO is not your General Counsel. We frame regulatory exposure and surface legal questions; we do not provide legal opinion as primary counsel. Your in-house or external lawyers retain that role.
Significant build work — full program implementation, multi-system DPIA library, large transfer mechanism work — is contracted as a separate project engagement, not absorbed into the retainer hour bucket.
Privacy platform subscriptions (OneTrust, Securiti, BigID, etc.), DSR portal licences and consent-management tooling are not included. Platform-neutral selection support is included; the licence cost is yours.
The DPO advises on the privacy implications of security incidents. We do not run your SOC, perform pen testing or operate security tooling. That is a separate cybersecurity engagement.
Travel to Riyadh, Bengaluru and Mumbai for committee and board sessions is included. Travel beyond those locations (regional offices, on-site investigation, regulator hearings) is billed at cost on prior agreement.
If a privacy matter goes to litigation, expert-witness work is contracted separately at a different rate structure. The retainer covers operational DPO function, not testimony preparation.
The questions below come up on most first calls. If yours is not here, the intake form is the right place — a senior member of the practice will respond within one working day.
A senior member of the practice will respond within one working day with a proposed scoping call. Submissions go to a practitioner — never a sales desk.
Not sure if DPOaaS is the right shape for what you are trying to do — or which tier fits? A 30-minute scoping call costs nothing. We will tell you honestly whether the retainer is the right answer, whether a Readiness Review or interim DPO would land better, or whether your situation calls for an in-house hire instead.
Schedule a call